Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

30 years have passed since the end of the socialist era, but housing in the Balkans seems frozen in time. The cities can be mapped with the relevant historical periods written in architectural styles. The center, with beautiful and restored Austro-Hungarian or German buildings, for example, mixed with the very few Ottoman houses and more abundant minarets, might be standing on antique ruins, as cities in Southeastern Europe are among the oldest in the world (Plovdiv, Bulgaria, claims the title of the oldest continuously inhabited city in Europe, with remains that date back to 4 000 BC). The suburbs are easily recognizable with their grey concrete more or less high towers. Ghettoized population might live on the outskirts, in temporary houses that have become permanent (the subject of Roma populations that were moved out of cities and housed in temporary buildings deserves its own blogpost for later). And now, in the last years, modern-looking buildings here and there complete this mosaic of periods in cities.

Plovdiv is a good though somewhat staged example, as it is a popular destination for tourists, especially since it was a 2019 European Capital of Culture, which allowed for a clean-up of the displays. The different historical periods are easily observed through a sightseeing tour that includes a Roman theatre (still used!) and Roman ruins underneath the main street, old typical Bulgarian village houses, a flair of the 1800s in the Ottoman district, and buildings with elegant facades. All the charming elements are regrouped, and the further apartment blocks can only be seen from the top of a hill.

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Roman remains, traditional or medieval houses and castles, impressive Renaissance buildings are preserved and protected across Europe (and the world) because of their historical significance of course, but also, let’s face it, because of their beauty. Who would want to tear down a fairytale-like castle that housed an important figure and that attracts tourists? Or an ornamented building where an important treaty was signed? These are examples of architectural treasures that locals are proud of.

But what about grey blocks? They are ugly, bland to the quick eye, and remnants of a period to be forgotten for most. The last years have been about overcoming the wrongs of socialism, and such blocks are a plain and rather imposing remain. They don’t hold the fascination of antique ruins nor the poise of an old church. They were ordinary buildings for ordinary people living ordinary life, and they still hold that same purpose.

Brașov, Romania

They were built quickly and not with the utmost care due to a lack of time and money. And they were not carefully serviced for the same reasons. Today this translates into buildings that are decaying, to the point where some become dangerous. So the need for restoration is blatant, yet lacking, and demolition threatening.

In all of the former Eastern block, urban planning raises the question of what to do with them. In Moscow, there are projects of demolishing blocks from the Krushchev era and replacing them with modern housing, even though it means displacing thousands of people.

In practical terms, apartment blocks should be preserved and restored, like other architectural heritages are, because it would be more expensive and longer to tear them down and build new modern ones, and because people are already living in them. In fact, in echo of the community feeling that socialist blocks fostered (perhaps one of their few positive achievements), some residents are trying to raise themselves the money needed for restoration.

The heritage dimension also brings a reason as to why they should be protected instead of demolished. As mentioned above, usually, architectural heritages are elements of pride. In this specific case, brutalist blocks are also a heritage, by their style, the context into which they were built and the socialist dream associated with them. But they are not a pride, and they are not money makers like an attractive castle would be. The reality is, they are slowly decaying, and only a few brutalist lovers who appreciate the peculiar beauty and respect the importance of the cultural and historical legacy of socialism interlocked in them are advocating for their preservation (upcoming post!).

Socialism may not be something to be celebrated, and I am not here to start a political debate on its merit and today’s nostalgia, but it should be remembered. People that lived through it and are still living in its remnants deserve recognition for their boxed lives. It is not just grey towers, it is construction projects meant to advocate for socialist values, it is a dictated use of space, and how dwellers tinkered with it, it is an architectural style that immediately triggers a reaction. It is a legacy of a political parenthesis and should be protected. Altered, renovated maybe, but preserved in its essence.

6 commentaires »

  1. Our modest house is an ordinary building where ordinary people live an (really) ordinary life ! 😏

    It’s often lest costly to tear down a building a build a new one when it wasn’t well maintained over the years but I’m with you that, like patrimonial houses, sometimes you have to think beyond the sole argument of money.

    David

    J’aime

    • But these ordinary memories make good stories!
      Maintenance was really not a priority to save money at first, but now it is raising even bigger financial problems…

      J’aime

  2. This post makes me think of the time that I visited Czechia back in 2015. Staying in Prague for over a week, I had the good fortune to explore the city at large, visiting notable locations such as the St. Vitus Cathedral and the Charles Bridge. The “old city” of Prague is beautiful, with hundreds of years of history contained within the core, with buildings such as the Prague astronomical clock and the Powder Tower giving the old city a beautiful character. At the same time, across the river in the newer Dejvice quarter, I stayed at the Hotel International Prague, a hotel that designed in the “socialist realism” style. The surrounding neighbourhood, too, was impressively brutalist in its architecture, the grey, square concrete buildings of the Cold War era dominating the landscape. It is very interesting to see how common this trend is across eastern Europe, and, as you mentioned with these blocks being torn down, renovated, or replaced by more modern architecture, it will be interesting to see how this brutalist architecture survives into the 21st century.

    Aimé par 1 personne

  3. An interesting read, it makes me think that while these buildings project history and tell a story of a time that is hard and brutal…like the buildings themselves it also is a symbol of some of these countries. While you would not want to be synonymous with decaying, grey, blocky, and bland to the eye they served a purpose and showcase a humble society and heritage of hard-working individuals who relate to these structures.

    I think that while some buildings that are beyond saving should make way for safer ones, people should try to save some that can be restored. Even though this style is associated with urban decay or totalitarianism, a revamp to style is in such a way that reflects some modernity that would showcase the old and new in these Balkan and Eastern European cities.

    Aimé par 1 personne

Votre commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s